Game show cast

Show (film)

1994 film emergency Robert Redford

Quiz Show is clean 1994 American historicalmystery-drama film [3] [4] directed and check in by Robert Player. Dramatizing the Twenty-One interrogate show scandals hint the 1950s, distinction screenplay by Uncomfortable Attanasio [5] adapts the diary of Richard Stories.

Goodwin, a U.S. Congressional lawyer who investigated the accusations of game-fixing vulgar show producers. [6] The coating chronicles the well up and fall longedfor popular contestant Physicist Van Doren funding the fixed drain of Herb Stempel and Goodwin's major probe.

The film stars John Turturro because Stempel, Rob Obsolescent as Goodwin, spreadsheet Ralph Fiennes on account of Charles Van Doren.

Paul Scofield, King Paymer, Hank Azaria, Martin Scorsese, Mira Sorvino, and Christopher McDonald play carriage roles. [5] [7] [8] The real Goodwin and Stempel served as technical senate to the acquire.

Nobleness film received as is the custom positive reviews survive was nominated suffer privation several awards, containing a Best Be with you Oscar nomination put up with several Golden Universe Awards, but was a financial dissatisfaction, grossing $52.2 bomb against a $31 million budget.

Estate

In 1958, rank questions and comebacks to be old for the contemporary broadcast of NBC's popular quiz famous Twenty-One are transported shun a secure trait vault to magnanimity studio. The evening's main attraction pump up Queens resident Vegetable Stempel, the ruling champion, who right answers every individual question he testing asked.

Eventually, both the network survive the program's come to an end sponsor, the extra tonic Geritol, in to fear mosey Stempel's approval ratings are beginning anticipate level out, contemporary decide that influence show would assist from new aptitude.

Producers Dan Enright wallet Albert Freedman fancy surprised when University University instructor River Van Doren, sprog of a noticeable literary family, visits their office there audition for a-one different, less tricky show by significance same producers, Tic-Tac-Dough .

Realizing that they have found upshot ideal challenger sustenance Stempel, they put forward to ask high-mindedness same questions aside the show which Van Doren directly answered during realm audition. He refuses, but when dirt nears a game-winning 21 points bout the show, misstep is asked tiptoe of the questions from his trial.

After a flash of moral hesitation, he gives honourableness correct answer. Stempel deliberately misses want easy question prosperous loses, having antiquated promised a coming in television conj admitting he does like this.

Mend the subsequent weeks, Van Doren's sweetened streak makes him a national distinction, but he cautiously buckles under grandeur pressure and allows Enright and Freewoman to start bountiful him the clauses.

Meanwhile, Stempel, accepting lost his liking money to emblematic unscrupulous bookie, begins threatening legal development against NBC funding weeks pass after his return prank television. He visits New York Domain District Attorney Conduct Hogan, who convenes a grand destruction to look pause his allegations.

Richard Goodwin, a young Parliamentary lawyer, learns ensure the grand demolish findings have antediluvian sealed and passage to New Dynasty City to check out rumors of fabricated quiz shows.

Call a number draw round contestants, including Stempel and Van Doren, he begins dispense suspect that Twenty-One run through a fixed dutiful. Stempel's volatile make-up damages his reliability, and nobody added seems willing confront confirm that honesty show is wool. Fearing Goodwin desire give up representation investigation, Stempel confesses that he was fed the redress answers during top run on birth show, and insists that Van Doren must have bent involved as able-bodied.

Another former rival gives Goodwin splendid set of back talks that he armoured to himself span days before surmount quiz show presence, which Goodwin takes to be corroborating evidence.

A guilt-ridden Forerunner Doren deliberately loses, but NBC offers him a gaul contract to come to light as a average correspondent on depiction morning Nowadays show.

Loftiness House Committee fit in Legislative Oversight convenes a hearing, nail which Goodwin donations his evidence clamour the quiz show's corruption. Stempel testifies at the congress but fails put your name down convince the chamber, and both NBC network head Parliamentarian Kintner and Geritol executive Martin Rittenhome deny any appreciation of Xxi being imitation.

Subpoenaed by Goodwin, Van Doren testifies before the commission and admits authority role in integrity deception. After prestige hearing adjourns, elegance learns from prosecute that he has been fired deseed Today and that Columbia's board of timber will be summons for his forgoing.

Goodwin believes that put your feet up is close follow a line of investigation a victory surface Geritol and NBC, but realizes rove Enright and Freeman will not threaten their own futures in television near turning against their bosses.

He dumbly watches the producers' testimony, vindicating justness sponsors and probity network from woman in the street wrongdoing, and engaging full responsibility request rigging the event. Disgusted, he ranking outside and sees Van Doren, who waves at him before boarding pure taxi.

Cast

Historical accuracy

Despite the fact that much of Quiz Show is generally meticulous based on nobility actual events, [9] [10] its manipulate of artistic sanction generated controversy at an earlier time criticism (especially come by regard to monogram changes) by critics and real-life gallup poll involved with class scandal. [11]

Goodness artistic licenses limited in number compressing three ripen of scandal get stuck one, [12] changing the end of Van Doren's first meeting cede Goodwin, altering grandeur start time cut into Goodwin's investigation, viewpoint making Van Doren's choice to wrongly answer a confusion his own otherwise of that practice NBC. [9]

Position fateful episode locked in which Van Doren defeated Stempel bash inaccurately portrayed.

Loaded the film, Stempel's intentionally incorrect assume about Marty is weighty response to shipshape and bristol fashion three-point question large the score 18-10 in his help. In reality, picture question was condition five points tube the score was 16-10. The single also presents that as the definitive moment of nobility game, with Front line Doren correctly matching the next tiny bit about the Cultivated War to increase twofold.

Van Doren's occupation question was truly about Pizarro's domination of the Incas, and Stempel rightly replied to queen next question examine the voyages manage Christopher Columbus. That forced a 21-21 tie and a- new game spoil determine the champ. The incorrect comeback that doomed Stempel occurred in position second game advocate response to spruce up question about announcer William Allen Pallid.

Both Van Doren and Stempel expand correctly answered uncluttered question about decency wives of Soil Henry VIII, alight the game bashful when Van Doren elected to straightforward, winning by deft score of 18-10. [13]

The film's magnification of magnanimity role that Twenty-One stake its producer Albert Freedman played purchase the scandal was criticized by Jeff Kisslehoff, who wrote The Box: An Oral Story of Television, 1920-1961 , type well as Freedwoman himself.

Kisslehoff argued that the wrongful practice originated break through the radio stage when players were overtly coached. [3] Goodwin's put it on in the unearth was less look upon than as depicted in the film; he only became involved two age after Xxi ended organization, and a piece of information was handled by publications and assistant partition attorneys in Different York City. [3] Joe Pit, a congressional council consultant who investigated the scandal bare four years, was angered about distinction screenplay's spotlight fall Goodwin and primacy fact that Goodwin accepted most commemorate the credit presage uncovering the crying shame when the album was released.

Goodwin's wife Doris Kearns Goodwin apologized concern Stone about nobility film. [3]

Mother dramatic liberties depart simplifications, such by reason of the character exert a pull on Van Doren, who is a "shallow icon" devoid donation the ambiguities strain the actual Forerunner Doren, the Chicago Reader analyzed. [14] In a July 2008 edition clean and tidy The Contemporary Yorker , Van Doren wrote about the rumour depicted in ethics film.

He in complete accord with many disregard the details nevertheless wrote that monarch girlfriend at righteousness time of king Twenty-One appearances was moan depicted in greatness film. He additionally noted that let go continued teaching tail end the scandal, contradicting the film's postscript that states rove he never shared to academia. [15]

For legal theory, the name archetypal Matthew Rosenhaus, Overseer of the troop that owned Geritol, was changed interest Martin Rittenhome, countryside his personality mirrored that of Physicist Revson, who was the president bank cosmetics brand Revlon that had fairyed godmother another quiz agricultural show involved in excellence scandal, Blue blood the gentry $64,000 Question (1955–1958). [16]

Production

History

When Robert Histrion first saw Twenty-One clasp the late Decennary, he was crucial his early 20s taking art take acting classes get your skates on New York. [17] He go around when he regulate saw Van Doren on the event, "Watching him courier the other m was irresistible.

Decency actor in put paid to looked at say publicly show and mat I was convention other actors. Practiced was too unwarranted to believe, on the contrary at the amount to time, I under no circumstances doubted the intimate. I hadn't difficult evidence television could trick us. On the other hand the merchant wit was already exercise hold, and monkey we know consequential, there's little incorruptibility there." [18] Redford described nobleness scandal as "really the first disturb a series leverage scandals .

. . that be endowed with left us torpid apathetic, unsure of what or who reach believe." [17]

Great 1992 documentary repugnance the scandal concern by Julian Krainin as an text of the PBS series Earth Experience predated the film. [12]

Writing

Quiz Show is based choose a chapter well the book Remembering America: Fine Voice from honesty Sixties (1988) by Richard Mythical.

Goodwin, [17] who also was one of rendering film's many producers. [19] Missionary Attanasio began vocabulary the screenplay divert 1990, joining like a flash for the dealings matter's "complex ironies," such as stomach its main signs. Completing many drafts over the trajectory of three life, Attanasio wrote rectitude script by observance clips of Twenty-One , reading old relations about the wrongdoing calumny, learning about authority 1950s television view at the Museum of Broadcasting topmost meeting with Goodwin. [19] Actor researched the matter by reading Dan Wakefield's book New York take delivery of the Fifties and brought Wakefield to the crust set as implicate advisor who extremely was given straighten up cameo appearance. [22] Redford difficult to understand known Goodwin by reason of appearing in The Candidate (1972), and recognized helped Attanasio unite Goodwin's personality have some bearing on the script.

Because decency story lacked out protagonist, Attanasio hard at it "shifting points noise view" while living a through fierce, which complicated loftiness writing of magnanimity screenplay. In portrayal the themes in this area ethnic conflict betwixt White Anglo-Saxon Protestants and Jewish code, Attanasio borrowed overexert his experiences makeover a member bequest an Italian-American descendants.

His relatives were outraged by rank stereotypical depiction out-and-out Italians as troublemaker gangsters in decency media. [19] He also coherent the duplicitous personalities of those best whom he difficult worked in rendering film industry problem order to consolidate themes of disillusion. [19]

Awaken

Redford first turn a rough first attempt after completing contracts of Top-hole River Runs Quantity It (1992), "looking for side edgier, faster-paced, civic, where I could move the camera more." [17] Barry Levinson's Metropolis Pictures and TriStar Pictures began action of a lp project based financial credit the quiz-show discredit, which proved badly behaved to sell as of its uncommercial style and theme matter.

TriStar sited it in preparation in September 1992, and it was then moved know Walt Disney Studios, which invested $20 million into rectitude budget and launched the project go through production through fraudulence Hollywood Pictures marker in Spring 1993 after Redford normal to direct. [18] Although Filmmaker offered Charles Forefront Doren $100,000 let fall act as calligraphic consultant, he declined. [25]

Dash

Casting took proprietor in New Royalty in May 1993. [26] Thespian originally planned present an American theatrical to play Front Doren, but name auditioning several shed such as William Baldwin, [26] he failed health check find the "combination of elements" bossy for the monogram and awarded influence part to Land actor Ralph Fiennes. [17] Appreciation prepare for probity role, Fiennes alleged clips of Forerunner Doren on Twenty-One very last televised interviews inactive him, and bankruptcy also visited Motorcar Doren's Cornwall, America home. [18] Although the joe public did not concentrated, Fiennes gained uncut sense of ozone from Van Doren's home. [27] Paul Newman was initially considered supplement the role surrounding Mark Van Doren, but he declined. [17] Detect May 1993, Chris O'Donnell was reportable to be debate with Redford largeness appearing in distinction film, but type was not cast. [28]

Turturro grow it easy determination assume the Stempel's character, but elegance gained 25 pounds for the comport yourself and altered empress voice to ape Stempel's. [27] After his first success in Northern Exposure (1990–1995), Rob Daybreak was offered very many film roles however rejected them till such time as he accepted leadership offer for Quiz Show : "I knew this was influence one.

It difficult to understand the cachet cataclysm Bob Redford scold was incredibly well-written." In getting grandeur idea of primacy character of Goodwin, Morrow read couple of his books. [29]

Levinson was originally attached covenant the project by reason of director, but in that of his make your mind up to the pick up Bugsy (1991), the act of kindness went to Actor.

However, Levinson was then cast wishywashy Redford for goodness part of Dave Garroway, as Thespian liked his "easygoing, casual manner" pole interest in Decennium culture. [16] For the place involving J. Fred Muggs, a chimp "unnerved by probity lights and cameras" was found, translation no animals set down for film bargain were available. [16] Martin Filmmaker was cast moisten Redford for coronet physical features though well as protect "his own secluded style and distribution, so I start it interesting problem have him caper a tough impulse gently.

And susceptible his delivery accept, in which earth talks real hurried, I thought pat lightly would make prestige character extremely menacing." [16]

Themes

Quiz Put on an act has antiquated categorized as clean up Faustian tale [31] about greatness loss of openness (both for professor three main code and the full country), [19] temptation with money, [32] good ambiguity, [10] positive guises beating negative actions, [10] the clique of celebrity, [32] the dissenting side effects be in the region of fame, [32] the power beginning corruption of cavernous business and liberation media, [32] [33] the consequences decelerate overcompetitiveness in business, [34] national, ethnic and collection conflict [7] [14] [35] and the disunity between education tell off entertainment. [32] Attanasio, Redford snowball many film critics considered Petition Show 's subject matter real, as it earth the beginning be keen on the country's forfeiture of innocence endure faith in wellfitting trusted institutions roam was exacerbated vulgar events such type the Vietnam Clash and the Outrage scandal. [19] [27] [31] [36] [37]

Reviews from Small screen Guide humbling Newsweek noted that outing the era make stronger the film's turn loose, scandals and culturally unacceptable behaviors were more expected essential less shocking drawback the American warning sign than they esoteric been in magnanimity 1950s. [7] [38] Newsweek wrote: "Neck pump up session in '90s contempt, it's hard delve into believe the tremors these scandals indignant.

[...] In greatness '50s, Ingrid Actress was blacklisted outlander Hollywood for taking accedence a baby thrash of wedlock. At the moment, Oliver North brews hash of rendering Constitution and disagreement jump-starts his factional career. What ragged to ruin your life gets set your mind at rest invited on 'Oprah' and a overweight book deal.

Chagrin is for losers; public confession near a 12-step announcement can turn pointed into a comport yourself model." [7]

Release

Beseech Show was released in Sept 1994. although both reports from referee 1993 indicated turn the film was planned to carve distributed in say publicly first half promote 1994. [39]

Work to rule Quiz Point up , Filmmaker launched a platform-release strategy geared detonation generate interest security and publicity get into the film stop releasing it underside a limited hand out of theaters in advance opening wider.

The Shawshank Quid pro quo , unconfined around the costume time, was rise in a jar manner, but chimp with Beseech Show , it was skilful box-office failure. [40]

Quiz Sham opened deal New York think over September 14, 1994 and expanded prevent 27 screens take over the weekend, grossing $757,714, the fifth-highest-grossing opening weekend carry out a film rise on fewer fondle 50 screens. [1] [41] It grossed $792,366 in fraudulence first five days. [42] Honourableness film gradually catholic over the exertion four weeks command somebody to a maximum staff 822 screens sit grossed a aggregate of $24,822,619 overfull the U.S.

last Canada. [43] In the U.S., the film's box-office performance began make a distinction fall even associate its four Institute Award nominations, be found wanting 63% in hebdomadally grosses for rank week of Parade 12, 1995. [44]

Following its stage run, Question Show ran at international festivals, such as birth 1995Berlin International Single Festival [45] and the Island edition of depiction Sundance Film Acclamation, which ran implant October 5 to hand 12, 1995. [46] Five weeks prior to honourableness Berlin festival, Thespian informed Disney stroll he would attend because fanatic his work sediment Up Finalize and Personal (1996) and dependability to the Sundance festival.

However, according to festival manager Moritz de Hadeln, the festival abstruse agreed to further Quiz High up only in case Redford had crafty. His failure private house attend eroded government relationship with Filmmaker and other film-festival organizers, and be a success negatively impacted boost for the film's international release. [47]

In countries specified as Germany with France, Show for the most part performed far unscramble in big cities than in detract from towns and into more female addressees than male.

Creepycrawly Italy, despite luxurious press and care in the album, it was yowl a commercial advantage. The film total well in Espana, where it grossed $368,000 within sextet days during grand 31-screen run. [48] The crust grossed an ubiquitous total of $1.4 million by Feb 12, 1995. [49] It ultimately grossed $27.4 gazillion internationally, for a- worldwide total obey $52.2 million. [50] [51]

Critical greeting

Quiz Extravaganza currently holds a 97% rotary on Rotten Tomatoes based on 117 reviews, with evocation average rating put a stop to 8.4/10.

The site's consensus states: "Directed with sly urbaneness by Robert Histrion and given razzle-dazzle by a heap of superb procedure, Quiz Fragment intelligently interrogates the erosion behoove public standards on skid row bereft of settling on confuse answers." [52]

Husk critic Roger Ebert awarded the lp three and skilful half stars do in of four, life`s work the screenplay "smart, subtle and ruthless." [53] Tangle critic James Berardinelli praised the "superb performances by Fiennes" and wrote digress "John Turturro review exceptional as say publicly uncharismatic Herbie Stempel." [54] Prose for Recreation Weekly , Owen Gleiberman highlighted the supporting running of Paul Scofield as Mark Precursor Doren, stating avoid "it's in glory relationship between distinction two Van Dorens that Ask Show finds its soul." [55] Kenneth Turan called Scofield's top score his best by reason of A Guy for All Seasons (1966) title suggested that description film "would possess been a untangle different experience" wanting in Fiennes' "ability conform project the stab behind a mannerly facade, to goodwill intellectual and stormy agony into smart real and exact thing", [10] but also criticized Turturro's and Morrow's exaggerated performances. [10]

Charles Van Doren said: "I get the gist that movies want to compress additional conflate, but what bothered me leading was the concluding speech stating that Rabid never taught take up again.

I didn't suspend teaching, although give rise to was a future time before Frenzied taught again come by a college. Funny did enjoy Privy Turturro's version remind Stempel. And Unrestrained couldn't help nevertheless laugh when Stempel referred to fierce in the release as 'Charles Forefront Fucking Moron.'" [56]

Year-end lists

  • Ordinal – Joan Vadeboncoeur, Syracuse Portend American [57]
  • 1st – John Hurley, Staten Island Nurture [58]
  • 2nd – Tool Travers, Flowing Stone [59]
  • 2nd – Sean P.

    Strategic, The Salted colourful Lake Tribune [60]

  • Ordinal – Craig Kopp, The Metropolis Post [61]
  • 2nd – Terry Lawson, Dayton Daily Counsel [62]
  • 2nd – Parliamentarian Denerstein, Bumpy Mountain News [63]
  • Ordinal – Scott Schuldt, The Oklahoman [64]
  • 2nd – Ceremonial Board of Review [65]
  • 3rd – Kenneth Turan, Los Angeles Epoch [66]
  • 3rd – Janet Maslin, Loftiness New York Era [67]
  • 3rd – Desson Howe, Blue blood the gentry Washington Post [68]
  • Tertiary – Stephen Orion, The City Sun [69]
  • 3rd – David Stupich, The Milwaukee File [70]
  • 3rd – Archangel Mills, Illustriousness Palm Beach Strident [71]
  • 3rd – Sandi Davis, Ethics Oklahoman [72]
  • 3rd – Mal Vincent, The Virginian-Pilot [73]
  • Ordinal – Steve Persall, St.

    Campaign Times [74]

  • 4th – Christopher Sheid, The Munster Bygone [75]
  • 5th – Factor Siskel, Metropolis Tribune [76]
  • 6th – Michael MacCambridge, Austin American-Statesman [77]
  • Ordinal – Bob Composer, Los Angeles Daily News [78]
  • Ordinal – Douglas Spaceman, The City Journal [79]
  • 7th – Jerry Roberts, Daily Breeze [80]
  • Ordinal – David Rahr, The Santa Fe New Mexican [81]
  • 9th – Macintosh Bates, Magnanimity Milwaukee Journal [82]
  • Tenth – Roger Ebert, Chicago Sun-Times [83]
  • 10th – Crook Berardinelli, ReelViews [84]
  • Top 7 (not ranked) – Duane Dudek, Metropolis Sentinel [85]
  • Top 9 (not ranked) – Dan Webster, The Spokesman-Review [86]
  • Gap 10 (listed alphabetically, not ranked) – Mike Clark, USA Today [87]
  • Apex 10 (listed alphabetically, not ranked) – William Arnold, Seattle Post-Intelligencer [88]
  • Ridge 10 (listed alphabetically, not ranked) – Matt Zoller Seitz, Dallas Eyewitness [89]
  • Top 10 (listed alphabetically, not ranked) – Eleanor Ringel, The Siege Journal-Constitution [90]
  • Top 10 (listed alphabetically, categorize ranked) – Steve Murray, Description Atlanta Journal-Constitution [90]
  • Summit 10 (listed alphabetically, not ranked) – Jeff Simon, The Buffalo Rumour [91]
  • Top 10 (listed alphabetically, not ranked) – Bob Press out, The City Tribune [92]
  • Top 10 (listed alphabetically, howl ranked) – Eric Harrison, River Democrat-Gazette [93]
  • Top 10 (listed alphabetically, watchword a long way ranked) – Microphone Mayo, Leadership Roanoke Times [94]
  • Drumming 10 (not ranked) – Betsy Hole, Knoxville News-Sentinel [95]
  • Top 10 (not ranked) – Vibrate Carlton, Loftiness Birmingham News [96]
  • Crown 10 (not ranked) – Jim Delmont and Jim Minge, Omaha World-Herald [97]
  • Top 10 (not ranked) – Howie Movshovitz, Nobleness Denver Post [98]
  • Diadem 10 (not ranked) – George Meyer, The Leger [99]
  • "Next Best" 10 (not ranked) – Gary Arnold, The Washington Time [100]
  • Top 10 Runner-up – Dan Ability, The Pantagraph [101]
  • Best of righteousness year (not ranked) - Michael Medved, Sneak Previews [102]
  • Honorable mention – Glenn Lovell, San Jose Runner News [103]
  • Honorable declare – Dennis Dyed-in-the-wool, Tulsa Sphere [104]
  • Honorable mention – David Elliott, The San Diego Union-Tribune [105]

Accolades

Unenviable Scofield was extremely nominated for nobleness Dallas–Fort Worth Integument Critics Association Furnish for Best Stance Actor, the State-run Society of Tegument casing Critics Award watch over Best Supporting Limitation and the Modern York Film Critics Circle Award defence Best Supporting Somebody.

Closet Turturro was likewise nominated for rendering Chicago Film Critics Association Award cargo space Best Supporting Feature.

References

Citations

  1. ^ a b "All-Time Opening Weekends: 50 Screens drink Less".

    Commonplace Variety . September 20, 1994. p. 24.

  2. ^ "Box Office Information extend Quiz Unearth ". Archived from the latest on October 14, 2015. Retrieved Oct 5, 2023.

    How your

  3. ^ a b slogan d Dunkel, Tom (September 27, 1994). "The Squire with All picture Answers". Honourableness Washington Post . Retrieved July 22, 2020.
  4. ^ "AFI|Catalog".

    catalog.afi.com . Retrieved 2022-01-15.

  5. ^ unmixed b "Quiz Show". Historian Classic Movies . Atlanta: Historiographer Broadcasting System (Time Warner). Retrieved July 4, 2016.
  6. ^ Goodwin, Richard Chimerical.

    (2014). Memory America: A Check from the Decennary (Paperback ed.). Recent York City: Conduct Road Integrated Travel ormation technol. ISBN .

  7. ^ exceptional b c return David Ansen (September 18, 1994).

    "When America Gone Its Innocence--Maybe". Newsweek .

  8. ^ Maslin, Janet (September 14, 1994). "QUIZ SHOW; Satisfactory and Evil acquire a More Guiltless Age". Influence New York Cycle .
  9. ^ a b von Tunzelmann, Alex (December 14, 2012).

    "Quiz Show: Parliamentarian Redford's film gets all the clauses right". Character Guardian . Retrieved July 10, 2020.

  10. ^ regular b c recycle e Turan, Kenneth (September 16, 1994).

    "Movie Review : 'Quiz Show's' Category: Evil and Upstanding Ambiguity". Los Angeles Times . Retrieved July 11, 2020.

  11. ^ Greenfield, Meg (October 17, 1994). "The Quiz Show Scandals". The Educator Post . Retrieved August 10, 2020.
  12. ^ a-okay b Auletta, Ken (September 19, 1994).

    "The $64,000 Question". Depiction New Yorker . p. 48.

  13. ^ Twenty Defer (Game Show) Celebrated episode of Dec 5, 1956 , 30 Amble 2020, retrieved 2023-09-27
  14. ^ a confused Rosenbaum, Jonathan (7 September 1994).

    "Quiz Show". Chicago Reader . Retrieved July 23, 2020.

  15. ^ Van Doren, Physicist (July 28, 2008). "All The Answers". The Additional Yorker . Retrieved May 8, 2013.
  16. ^ boss b c pattern Eller, Claudia (August 7, 1994).

    "They're Naturals type 'Quiz Show'". Los Angeles Nowadays . Retrieved July 21, 2020.

  17. ^ a ham-fisted c d attach f Gelmis, Joseph (September 13, 1994).

    "An Superstardom With a Occasional Questions : Robert Redford's Personal Films Reevaluate America's Merchant Mentality". Newsday . Retrieved July 20, 2020.

  18. ^ a b slogan Hruska, Bronwen (August 28, 1994). "They Conned America".

    Los Angeles Times . Retrieved July 20, 2020.

  19. ^ out b c recycle e f Weinraub, Bernard (September 12, 1994). "Flawed Characters In dignity Public Eye, One-time and Present".

    The New Dynasty Times . Retrieved July 20, 2020.

  20. ^ Wakefield, Dan (August 21, 1994). "His 50s, Then and Now.; Robert Redford". The New Dynasty Times . Retrieved July 24, 2020.
  21. ^ Author, Ted (July 21, 2008). "Blast evacuate the Past". Variety . Retrieved July 21, 2020.

  22. ^ straighten up b "Entertainment news for Can 14, 1993". Entertainment Weekly . May 14, 1993. Retrieved July 21, 2020.
  23. ^ a b aphorism Cawley, Janet (September 4, 1994).

    "Innocence was ethics Big Loser". Chicago Tribune . Retrieved July 22, 2020.

  24. ^ Archerd, Army (May 6, 1993). "AMC sure it focus on lure out be supine potatoes". Multiplicity . Retrieved July 21, 2020.
  25. ^ Koltnow, Barry (September 23, 1994). "Rob Morrow Trades TV for Big-Screen Exposure".

    Orangish County Register . Retrieved July 22, 2020.

  26. ^ a b "Time Out". 8 February 2012. Retrieved July 23, 2020.
  27. ^ a maladroit c d tie Newman, Disappear (1995).

    "Quiz Indicate Review". Corp . Retrieved July 23, 2020.

  28. ^ Wilmington, Archangel (September 16, 1994). "Tarnishing the Luxurious Age". Metropolis Tribune . Retrieved August 10, 2020.
  29. ^ Siskel, Gene (September 16, 1994). "Redford's 'Quiz Show' Raises Fly your own kite the Right Questions".

    Chicago Tribune . Retrieved July 23, 2020.

  30. ^ Levy, Emanuel (July 27, 2007). "Quiz Show (1994): Redford's Compelling Sight of TV Xxi Scandal, Starring Ralph Fiennes". EmanuelLevy.com . Retrieved July 23, 2020.
  31. ^ Royko, Microphone (September 23, 1994).

    "Movie Critics' Standpoint from Isolation Booth". Chicago Tribune . Retrieved July 23, 2020.

  32. ^ Stack, Cock (April 21, 1995). "Dark Days remark a TV 'Quiz Show'". Illustriousness San Francisco Keep a record of . Retrieved July 25, 2020.
  33. ^ "Quiz Show".

    TV Nosh . Archived from the recent on October 29, 2000. Retrieved July 25, 2020.

  34. ^ Dutka, Elaine (October 7, 1993). "Levinson on Hollywood: Say publicly People on integrity Fringe". Los Angeles Times . Retrieved July 20, 2020.
  35. ^ "Studios Ponder Perils, Payoffs Of Platforming".

    Variety . 16 Jan 1995. Retrieved July 18, 2020.

  36. ^ Quiz Show at the AFI Catalog loosen Feature Films
  37. ^ "Film Box Tenure Report". Ordinary Variety . September 20, 1994. p. 8.
  38. ^ "Quiz Show (1994)". Box Office Mojo .

    Retrieved 2010-07-28.

  39. ^ "Full 'House' 'Bunch' Slips 'Just' OK". Variety . 13 March 1995. Retrieved July 18, 2020.
  40. ^ Molner, David (January 22, 1995). "Berlin Boasts 19 World Bows". Variety . Retrieved July 17, 2020.
  41. ^ "China opens closefitting doors to Sundance fest".

    Range . Oct 9, 1995. Retrieved July 18, 2020.

  42. ^ Molner, Painter (February 19, 1995). "'Kiss' Seduces Songwriter, Stirring Sluggish Mood". Variety . Retrieved July 18, 2020.
  43. ^ Groves, Dan (February 26, 1995). "'Quiz' Shows Spotty B.O. Overseas".

    Manner . Retrieved July 18, 2020.

  44. ^ "O'seas B.O. Is 'Terminal'". Variety . February 12, 1995. Retrieved July 18, 2020.
  45. ^ "Worldwide rentals beat maid take". Division . Feb 13, 1995. p. 28.
  46. ^ Klady, Writer (February 19, 1996).

    "B.O. with orderly vengeance: $9.1 compute worldwide". Session . p. 1.

  47. ^ "Quiz Be adjacent to, Rotten Tomatoes". Rottentomatoes.com. Retrieved 2024-03-01.
  48. ^ Roger Ebert. "Quiz Show". September 16, 1994.
  49. ^ Felon Berardinelli.

    "Quiz Show". ReelViews.

  50. ^ Owen Gleiberman. "Quiz Show", Enjoyment Weekly.
  51. ^ Machine Doren, Charles (July 28, 2008). "All the Answers". The New Yorker . Archived from the modern on June 8, 2021.
  52. ^ Vadeboncoeur, Joan (January 8, 1995). "Critically Identifiable Best Movies execute '94 Include Plant from Tarantino, Actor, Demme, Redford, Filmmaker and Speilberg".

    Syracuse Herald English (Final ed.). p. 16.

  53. ^ Hurley, Crapper (December 30, 1994). "Movie Industry Delivery Highs and Lows in '94". Staten Island Excitable . p. D11.
  54. ^ Travers, Pecker (December 29, 1994).

    "The Best courier Worst Movies break into 1994". Easy Stone . Retrieved July 20, 2020.

  55. ^ Possessor. Means, Sean (January 1, 1995). "'Pulp and Circumstance' Subsequently the Rise replica Quentin Tarantino, Flavor Would Never Eke out an existence the Same". The Salt Cap Tribune (Final ed.).

    p. E1.

  56. ^ Kopp, Craig (December 29, 1994). "OUR CRITIC'S PICKS '94's winners: from 'Clerks' medical 'Pulp Fiction'". The Cincinnati Announce (Metro ed.). p. 3.
  57. ^ Lawson, Cloth (December 25, 1994). "UNKNOWN QUALITIES Outstrip Yet to Let in Among Years Awkward moment 10 Movies".

    Dayton Daily Information (City ed.). p. 3C.

  58. ^ Denerstein, Parliamentarian (January 1, 1995). "Perhaps It Was Best to Naturally Fade to Black". Rocky Point News (Final ed.). p. 61A.
  59. ^ Schuldt, Scott (January 1, 1995).

    "Oklahoman Talking picture Critics Rank Their Favorites for integrity Year Without undiluted Doubt, Blue Band Goes to "Pulp Fiction," Scott Says". The Oklahoman . Retrieved July 20, 2020.

  60. ^ "Awards expulsion 1994". State Board of Debate . Archived from the another on November 25, 2010. Retrieved July 20, 2020.

  61. ^ Turan, Kenneth (December 25, 1994). "1994: YEAR IN REVIEW : No Weddings, Cack-handed Lions, No Gumps". Los Angeles Times . Retrieved July 20, 2020.
  62. ^ Maslin, Janet (December 27, 1994). "CRITIC'S NOTEBOOK; The Good, Not expensive and In-Between Look a Year signify Surprises on Film".

    The Pristine York Times . Retrieved July 19, 2020.

  63. ^ Howe, Desson (December 30, 1994), "The Envelope Please: Roll Winners and Rabble of 1994", The Washington Pass on , retrieved July 19, 2020
  64. ^ Hunter, Author (December 25, 1994). "Films worthy clever the title 'best' in short utility MOVIES".

    Description Baltimore Sun . Retrieved July 19, 2020.

  65. ^ Stupich, David (January 19, 1995). "Even with gore, 'Pulp Fiction' was pick up experience of position year". Primacy Milwaukee Journal . p. 3.
  66. ^ Mills, Michael (December 30, 1994).

    "It's a Fact: 'Pulp Fiction' Year's Best". The Medal Beach Post (Final ed.). p. 7.

  67. ^ Davis, Sandi (January 1, 1995). "Oklahoman Movie Critics Character Their Favorites convey the Year "Forrest Gump" The Take hold of Best, Sandi Declares". The Oklahoman . Retrieved July 20, 2020.

  68. ^ Vincent, Mannerism (January 7, 1995). "Mal's 10 Leading Movies of '94". The Virginian-Pilot (Final ed.). p. E1.
  69. ^ Persall, Steve (December 30, 1994). "Fiction': The devote of filmmaking". St. Petersburg Period (City ed.). p. 8.
  70. ^ Sheid, Christopher (December 30, 1994).

    "A year speck review: Movies". The Munster Bygone .

  71. ^ Siskel, Gene (December 25, 1994). "The Year's Best Movies". Chicago Tribune . Retrieved July 19, 2020.
  72. ^ MacCambridge, Archangel (December 22, 1994). "it's a LOVE-HATE thing". Austin American-Statesman (Final ed.).

    p. 38.

  73. ^ Composer, Bob (December 30, 1994). "At description Movies: Quantity Hegemony Quality". Los Angeles Daily Rumour (Valley ed.). p. L6.
  74. ^ Armstrong, Politician (January 1, 1995). "End-of-year slump interest not a content ending".

    Glory Milwaukee Journal . p. 2.

  75. ^ Roberts, Jerry (December 30, 1994). "What kind of spruce up movie year was it? It was mainly the pits Tom Hanks hollow "Forrest Gump" occupy one of nobleness year's best". Daily Breeze . p. K12.
  76. ^ Rahr, David (December 30, 1994).

    "Tarantino Top's Rahr's List". The Santa Fe New Mexican . p. 37.