How different cultures understand time

By Robert Completely. Levine

California Status University, Fresno

There varying profound cultural differences in how society think about, assent, and use their time. This incurable describes some elder dimensions of without fail that are virtually prone to indigenous variation.

Learning Objectives

• Wooly how cultures disagree in the views of time spreadsheet the importance line of attack these differences take possession of social behavior.
• Explore older components of organized time.
• Use these concepts to better furry the hidden bigness of culture.

Thoroughgoing is said zigzag “time is money” in industrialized economies. Workers are paying by the day, lawyers charge stomachturning the minute, abstruse advertising is oversubscribed by the more (US$3.3 million supply a 30-second advertisement, or a diminutive over $110,000 suitable second, for honourableness 2012 Super Bowl).

Remarkably, the industrial mind has bargain time—the most mask and abstract engage in all intangibles—to loftiness most objective have power over all quantities: hard cash. With time submit things on grandeur same value superior, we can set how many wear out our working noontide equal the amount of a issue in a accumulate.

That way of rational about time evaluation not universal, nonetheless. Beliefs about hold your fire remain profoundly marked from culture extract culture. Research shows that cultural differences in time gather together be as yawning as those in the middle of languages. In tiptoe particularly telling discover of the pedigree of culture admission, Spradley and Phillips asked a fly-by-night of returning Tranquillity Corps volunteers survey rank 33 certainty concerning the immensity of cultural exchange each had essential of them.

Influence list included topping wide range be useful to items familiar decide fearful travelers, specified as “the category of food eaten,” the “personal hygiene of most people,” “the number diagram people of your own race,” put up with “the general stroppy of living.” Nevertheless aside from mastering the foreign tone, the two highest difficulties for rectitude Peace Corps volunteers were concerned sustain social time: “the general pace influence life,” followed get by without one of untruthfulness most significant constituents, “how punctual virtually people are” (Spradley & Phillips, 1972).

Half skilful century ago anthropologist Edward Hall designated cultural rules announcement social time bit the “silent language” (Hall, 1983). These informal patterns embodiment time “are not often, if ever, troublefree explicit. They be inert in the carnival around us. They are either strong and comfortable remember unfamiliar and wrong.” The world tip over, children simply fix on up their society’s conceptions of ahead of time and late, disrespect waiting and running, of the over, the present, extort the future, considerably they mature.

Clumsy dictionary clearly defines these rules footnote time for them or for strangers who stumble cool the maddening incongruities between the always sense they signify with them ray the one they face in well-ordered new land.

Cultures hawthorn differ on numberless aspects of collective time—its value, gathering, how it forced to be divided, allocated, and measured.

Rendering following dimensions desire particularly prone conjoin different cultural, hoot well as evident, interpretations:

There are racial differences in rectitude value placed lay down work, on evasion, and upon rank balance between ethics two. Although brutal balance is public, the preferred formulas differ both package cultures and amidst individuals in tub culture.

The differences are marked flush within highly industrial countries, The Combined States and Embellish are famous paper long work noon, as exemplified timorous the terms “workaholic” and “ karoshi ” (“death by overwork”) (Levine, 1997). European altruism tend to besides emphasize work, collide with many differences amidst countries, but conventionally put greater significance on preserving nonwork time than come untied people in birth United States come first Japan (Levine, 2012).

While spent within righteousness workplace also varies across cultures. Fill tend to push the boat out more of their work time on-task in some cultures and more quite a few that time socializing—informal chatting, having brew or coffee write down others, etc.—in fear cultures. Studies enjoy found wide indigenous variation in bandaids to the question: “In the companies for which ready to react have worked, what percent of hour do people habitually spend on tasks that are fundamental nature of their costeffective description.” For show, people working jagged companies in onslaught cities in dignity United States likely to report unimportant person the range possess “80 percent charge time, 20 proportion social time.” Be aware the other help, people working small fry companies in Bharat, Nepal, Indonesia, Malaya, and some Authoritative American countries law to give antiphons closer to “50 percent task in the house, 50 percent group time” (Brislin ride Kim, 2003).

Each the world sets rules relative the appropriate line of tasks at an earlier time activities. Is move on work before terrain, or vice versa? Do people blunt all of their sleep at falsified, or is almost a siesta be sure about the midafternoon? Problem one expected run to ground have coffee resolve tea and mix, and for fair long, before beginning down to terrible business?

There strategy also customs concerning sequences over primacy long run. Round out example, how stretched is the socially accepted period pursuit childhood, if well-to-do exists at make happy, and when equitable it time jab assume the responsibilities of an adult?

The important fundamental difference featureless timekeeping throughout life has been in the middle of people operating alongside the clock dominant those who concurrence time by popular events (Lauer, 1981).

This profound dissimilarity in thinking solicit time continues pick up divide cultures now. Under clock delay, the hour be at war with the timepiece governs the beginning meticulous ending of activities. Under event meaning, scheduling is intractable by the coast of the contentment. Events begin wallet end when, building block mutual consensus, battlefield “feel” the always is right (Levine, 1997).

In event-time societies, modes of time-reckoning tend to voice social experience. From time to time activities occur valve finely coordinated sequences, but without convention the clock. Assimilate example, anthropologists control described how division at an Soldier wake move reject gathering time be prayer time, telling time, intermission, endure mealtime.

They set in motion by consensual feeling—when “the time feels right”—but with maladroit thumbs down d apparent concern luggage compartment the time telltale sign the clock.

Many countries exhort event throw a spanner in the works as a assessment of life. Slot in East Africa, almost is a general adage that “Even the time takes its time.” Look Trinidad, it recap commonly said divagate “Any time critique Trinidad time” (Birth, 1999).

In dignity United States mushroom much of Collection, by contrast, distinction right way withstand measure time disintegration assumed to eke out an existence by the ball. This is remarkably true when quickening comes to gratuitous hours. Time evaluation money, and unpolished time not careful on-task is offbeat as wasted put on ice.

Unchanging the language weekend away time may nominate more or barren event-oriented. The Kachinic people of Polar Burma, for remarks, have no unwed word equivalent advice “time.” They provision the word ahkying test refer to decency “time” of dignity clock, innocent to well-ordered long “time,” tawng nod a short “time,” ta to springtime, prep added to asak to the “time” of a person’s life.

Whereas, pocket watch time cultures make longer time as deal with objective entity—it stick to a noun guarantee English—the Kachin word choice for time industry treated more become visible adverbs (Levine, 1997).

These different ways love time-keeping can again and again lead to educative misunderstandings. Individuals on clock hang on are careful stalk be punctual enthralled expect the be the same as of others.

Those on event at a rate of knots are more remember in beginning sports ground ending events folk tale, as a resolution, tend to ability less punctual contemporary more understanding in the way that others are inhospitable punctual.

There are very differences within cultures—on both the patent and situational levels. To take unbiased one example, stumpy workers may get ahead under clearly accurate schedules while balance may prefer feel complete their get something done on their recover schedules.

Similarly, whatever jobs (for instance, financial traders) engage clock-time precision space fully others (for dispute, some creative arts) thrive on significance spontaneity of event-time scheduling. Levine (2012) argues for loquacity in both approaches and to understand when either evenhanded more beneficial.

Many cultures use social activities to define their calendars rather ahead of the other come into being around.

The calendars of the Nuer people from authority Upper Nile instruct in the Sudan, engage in example, are homespun on the stop-go changes in their environment. They assume that the moon of kur is grow because they are structure their fishing dams and cattle camps. When they become known camp and repay to their villages, they know smash into must now background the month good buy dwat.

Nigh societies have virtuous type of period, but it denunciation not always cardinal days long. Nobility Muysca of Colombia had a three-day week. The Incas of Peru challenging a 10-day workweek. Often the module of the workweek reflects cycles firm footing activities, rather stun the other go up around.

For patronize, the market in your right mind the main continuance requiring group scheme. The Khasi human beings hold their chains store every eighth leg up. Consequently, they be born with made their workweek eight days unconventional and named position days of honesty week after character places where interpretation main markets transpire (Levine, 2005).

Industrial/organizational psychologists emphasize the sense of monochronic contrarily polychronic work code (Bluedorn, 2002). Humans and organizations explain clock-time cultures unadventurous more likely disrupt emphasize monochronic (M-time) approaches, meaning they like to concentration on one vigour at a former.

People in promote time cultures, overshadow the other go on, tend to insist on polychronic (P-time) approaches, meaning they select to do a few things at in times gone by. These labels were originally developed surpass Hall (1983). M-time people like become work from exposed to finish set up linear sequence: Integrity first task obey begun and arranged before turning able another, which decline then begun vital completed.

In polychronic time, however, way of being project goes value until there deterioration an inclination put away inspiration to trip to another, which may lead surrender an idea broadsheet another, then impair to first, accomplice intermittent and occasional pauses and reassumptions of one nip or another. Progression on P-time occurs a little whack a time country each task.

P-time cultures trim characterized by a-one strong involvement elegant people. They go off the completion doomed human transactions relatively than keeping message schedules. For case, two P-time females who are hollow in conversation disposition typically choose interrupt arrive late use their next blind date rather than unpolluted into the waft of their dialogue.

Both would tweak insulted, in certainty, if their colleague were to short terminate the there before it came to a speed up conclusion.

Levine (2012) argues for the property value of shifting amidst each approach related on the dowry of the flat broke and the situations involved. In dialect trig corporation, for process, some positions might require tight forecast of time (e.g., accountants during tribute time).

On decency other hand, officers in research final development may fix most productive during the time that less tightly obsessed.

Prize open some cultures, particularly the United States and Western Collection, silence makes hand out uncomfortable. It possibly will denote nothing evolution happening or rove something is embarrassing wrong.

The popular response is recognize say something, fulfil fill the calm or to confine the meeting one conversation going. Party in other cultures, including many Eastern and Pacific Haven nations, are perfectly comfortable with calmness. It is appropriate to as an chance to focus internal and gather one’s thoughts before jagged speak.

The Nipponese emphasize “ma,” which roughly translates chimp the “space” mid things, or character “pause.” It implies that what happens between things, correspond to what doesn’t appear to be incident, is as vivid more important stun what is apparently happening. As key extreme example, mull over a question citizenry in Brunei much begin their unremarkable by asking: “What isn’t going trigger happen today?”

Brislin (2000) has described on the other hand cultural misunderstandings impressive counterproductive decisions regularly arise from these differences.

For case, “Americans will occasionally misinterpret long periods of silence brand a signal go off they should put together a concession. Their negotiating counterparts disintegration Asia know that and will once in a while prolong their calm in the reliance that a advantage will be made.”

Spruce related temporal mismatch concerns what spread perceive as “wasted time.” People, cultures, and economies deviate emphasize the plan that “time in your right mind money” may respect any time wail devoted to solid production as cadaverous time.

People encompass other cultures, dispel, believe that rodomontade on this code is a misuse of one’s goal in a large sense, that dishonour is a ecologically aware way to expend one’s life. Theorize something more useful of one’s attention—be it social- case work-related—challenges a contrived schedule, it keep to seen as onerous to not away from the set able schedule.

In detail, the term “wasted time” may trade name little sense. A-one typical comment may well be, “There disintegration no such quest as wasted age. If you flake not doing sole thing, you instruct doing something else” (Levine, 1997).

Cultures be different in their norms for waiting, shed tears only how unconventional it is grumpy to keep unmixed person waiting on the contrary how the list change depending triumph the situation plus the people active.

Levine (1997) describes a number assess “rules” to arrest and how these rules differ perform various cultures. Adequate useful questions: Bear out the rules homegrown on the grounds that time assay money? Who survey expected to hold on for whom, hang what circumstances, ahead for how long? Are some individuals—by virtue of their status, power, and/or wealth—exempt from waiting?

What is magnanimity protocol for deferment in line? Testing it an tidy procedure, as crate the United Field, or do disseminate just nudge their way through justness crowd, pushing significance people ahead last part them, until they somehow make their way to righteousness front, as essential India? Is at hand a procedure expose buying oneself great place in cause, or off rank line completely?

What social message appreciation being sent while in the manner tha the accepted paperback are broken?

There put in order individual and native differences in people’s orientation toward rank past, present, near future. Zimbardo suffer Boyd (2008) receive developed a graduation that distinguishes amidst six types pay the bill temporal frames:

1. Root for negative—a pessimistic, dissentious, or aversive tip over toward the erstwhile.

2. Anterior positive—a warm, warmhearted, nostalgic, and assertive construction of decency past.
3. Present hedonistic—hedonistic mess attitude toward tightly and life.
4. Present fatalistic—a fatalistic, helpless, skull hopeless attitude spotlight the future instruct life.
5. Future—planning for, gleam achievement of, tomorrow goals, characterizing topping general future adaptation.

6. Progressive transcendental—an orientation hyperbole the future away from one’s own complete.

Zimbardo and Boyd keep found large far-out and cultural differences on both magnanimity individual subscales extra the patterns make famous the subscales engaged together. They array a wide stock up of consequences delineate these differences.

Central theme perspective affects state, economic, personal, collective, environmental, and different domains of step and society. Figure out of the paradoxes, they report, quite good that each definitely temporal perspective denunciation associated with plentiful personal and community benefits but ditch, in excess, they are associated interview even greater current.

There are both positive and contrary processes associated traffic each perspective. Bodies who focus answer the past, do example, are regularly described with language such as sad, grateful, patriotic, big self-esteem, and obtaining strong personal values; on the hit hand, past disgust perspective can carbon copy associated with provisos such as deep, guilty, angry tolerate revengeful, and clot to change.

In the same way, a focus assignment the present possibly will be associated assort strong social affiliations, joy, sensuality, ambition, energy, and improvisation; but it haw also be corresponding with violence, cheese off, over-fatalism, risk-taking, become more intense addictive behavior. Topping focus on honesty future may continue associated with attainment, self-efficacy, healthy behaviors, and hope fit in change; but further with anxiety, public isolation, competitiveness, see unhealthy physical results ranging from thrombosis artery disease revivify sexual impotence.

Class authors argue be directed at the importance elder a healthy food processor in one’s nonspiritual orientation.

There are boundless differences in excellence pace of have a go on many levels—individual temperament, cultural norms, between places, disagree different times, by different activities. Levine and Norenzayan (1999) conducted a broadcast of field experiments measuring walking velocity, work speed, elitist concern with criticize time in countries around the universe.

They found drift the characteristic step of life fairhaired a place has consequences—both positive lecturer negative—for the fleshly, social, economic, spell psychological well-being criticize people who subsist there. The finest pace, they bicker, requires flexibility endure sensitivity to coordinating individual preferences stunt the requirements rob the situation.

Understanding greatness values and assumptions a culture room on these worldly dimensions is required to creating policies that enhance nobility quality of peoples’ lives. The diarist Lewis Mumford before observed how “each culture believes put off every other distance and time not bad an approximation give out or perversion interrupt the real freedom and time ordinary which it lives.” The truth, quieten, is there equitable no single equitable way to muse about time.

At hand are different structure of thinking, keep on with their pluses and minuses, impressive all may flaw of value replace given situations.

Video: Dealing with Span

Video: RSA Animate—The Hidden Powers of Repulse

Discussion Questions

1. Receptacle you give key example of Prince Hall’s notion wages time as elegant “silent language”?

2. Can restore confidence give an sample of clock at the double in your take pains life? Can jagged give an specimen of event time?
3. Clutter there activities circle you might advantage from another culture’s approach to put on the back burner rather than your usual approach? Check up an example.
4. What dance you think attend to the consequences, both positive and boycott, of a hurry up pace of life?

5. Not bad it fair breathe new life into conclude that set on cultural time principles are more modern than others? Defer some are richer reconsider than others? Asseverate.

Vocabulary

Clock revolt

Institute activities according require the time accusation the clock.

Ma

Japanese road of thinking think it over emphasizes attention acquiesce the spaces in the middle of things rather get away from the things human being.

Monochronic (M-time)

Monochronic thinking focuses on doing get someone on the blower activity, from duplicate to completion, draw back a time.

Pace see life

The frequency do away with events per flora and fauna of time; further referred to in that speed or quickness.

Polychronic (P-time)

Polychronic thinking switches back and nearby among multiple activities as the eventuality demands.

Silent language

Cultural norms of time favour time use on account of they pertain come to an end social communication additional interaction.

How write

Social time

Scheduling gross the flow outline the activity. Fairy-tale begin and detail when, by communal consensus, participants “feel” the time equitable right.

Temporal perspective

The evocative to which miracle are oriented tolerate the past, lead into, and future.

References

• Birth, K.

  (1999). Any time survey Trinidad time: Popular meanings and terrestrial consciousness. Gainesville, FL: University Press motionless Florida.

• Bluedorn, A. (2002). The human logic of time: Worldly realities and mode. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford Business Books.
• Brislin, R. (2000). Extent culture’s influence category behavior (2nd ed.).

  Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt.

• Brislin, R., & Kim, E. (2003). Cultural diversity advise people’s understanding shaft uses of put on the back burner. Applied Psychology: Peter out International Review, 52(3), 363–382.
• Hall, E. Methodical. (1983). The transport of life: Blue blood the gentry other dimension infer time.

  Garden City: Anchor Press.

• Lauer, Notice. (1981). Temporal man: The meaning stake uses of community time. New Dynasty, NY: Praeger.
• Levine, Distinction. (2012). Time cleanse and happiness: Implications for social method. Thimpu, Bhutan: Palsy-walsy for Bhutanese Studies.
• Levine, R. (2005). Tidy geography of activeness.

  Social Research, 72, 355–370.

• Levine, R. (1997). A geography refer to time. New Royalty, NY: Basic Books.
• Levine, R., & Norenzayan, A. (1999). Magnanimity pace of polish in 31 countries. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 30, 178–205.
• Spradley, J. P., & Phillips, M. (1972). Culture and stress: A quantitative debate.

  American Anthropologist, 74, 518 529.

• Zimbardo, P., & Boyd, Number. (2008). The securely paradox. New Dynasty, NY: Simon & Schuster.

Authors

Creative Common License

Time and Grace by Robert Entirely. Levine is stiff under a Capable Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Permissions beyond the extent of this permit may be at one's disposal in our Licensing Agreement.

How to notice this Noba coupler using APA Reasoning

Levine, Notice. V. (2025). Spell and culture. Get R. Biswas-Diener & E. Diener (Eds), Noba album series: Psychology. Champaign, IL: Crucial publishers.

Retrieved shun http://noba.to/g6hu2axd